Just because it's not Tony versus Gordon anymore, it doesn't mean it can't be Gordon versus Alistair and Yvette does it? I wonder how heated the argument was?
Friday, March 07, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Search Dizzy Thinks
Dizzy reads
- Ben Brogan
- Big Brother Watch
- Boulton & Co
- Coffee House
- Conservative Home
- Dan Hannan
- Donal Blaney
- Douglas Carswell MP
- FT Westminster
- Guido Fawkes
- Hoby Cartoons
- Iain Dale
- Keep Thinking Butch
- Nadine Dorries
- Nothing British
- Old Holborn
- Paul Waugh
- Political Betting
- Politics Home
- Quizzicalgaze
- Red Box
- Shane Greer
- Sky.com/News Blog
- Tory Radio
Not Lefties
Blog Archive
-
►
2011
(140)
- November (2)
- October (3)
- August (1)
- July (3)
- June (2)
- May (14)
- April (5)
- March (43)
- February (25)
- January (42)
-
►
2010
(658)
- December (50)
- November (56)
- October (21)
- September (34)
- August (32)
- July (44)
- June (51)
- May (69)
- April (87)
- March (92)
- February (62)
- January (60)
-
►
2009
(1050)
- December (60)
- November (60)
- October (65)
- September (78)
- August (85)
- July (85)
- June (96)
- May (119)
- April (104)
- March (115)
- February (86)
- January (97)
4 comments:
i don't think that's what he means. i think the argument could have been between any combination of them, or indeed between all of them on one side and civil servants on the other.
but anyway i reckon it was a hoax from someone who recognised pollard
Got be honest I liked the Blair vs. Brown thing because I enjoyed seeing them both pissed off. I couldn't care less if Alistair 'Guinness face' Darling or Yvette Cooper are cheesed off they are too dull to worry about.
dizzy usually jumps to the wrong conclusion
Yes, a bit like anonymous commenters that could not spot opportunistic piss taking if it jumped up and slapped them round the face whilst reading out an explanation to at the same time.
Post a Comment