Blogging about blogging is so boring I know, but one of my blogging mates was in court today up on a drink driving charge. Guido didn't get sent down, but did lose his license, get put on curfew and other assorted wrist slappings. I can't link to his post because I am blogging via email, but if you go and read there is something interesting in it.
You see, Guido's fan Tim 'I'm Not an Obsessive Stalker' Ireland turned up at court to watch from the Public Gallery. Now doubt of course done in the name of reporting the news and not because he is utterly chicken oriental. No doubt this post will be seen as an attemtp to smear Tim Ireland's good name, or some equally absurd conspiracy will be invented with an essay to accompany on his blog.
Update: As predicted Tim Ireland has now claimed that those who did not blog about Guido going to court were involved in a "conspiracy of silence". Note it's his word conspiracy now, so he can't accuse others of calling him a conspiracy theorist when he himself says that a conspiracy existed.
There is also some of the most ludicorus reasoning I have ever seen displayed. For example we have this juicy piece of idiocy: "If drinking causes problems, then you have a drinking problem. If drinking causes serious problems, then you have a serious drinking problem.". That's a bit like saying "I am holding a pen and there are no bees here. Therefore this pen protects me from bees".
Frankly, a muppet has better reasoning capacity than Tim's latest and rather pathetic jaunt into obsessive posting masquerading as serious argumentation. And no Tim, you won;t be able to post a comment here if you try.
25 comments:
That guy is one big bowl of crazy.
Actually, if things had worked out, there would have been a gang of us sitting in the public gallery with big grins.
The plan was to see him get sentenced, find a pub with a wifi spot, laugh like a bunch of hyenas and then blog the proceedings. Various commitments unfortunately got in the way and Tim, already having appointments in town, went anyway.
But don't let that disavow you of your little hypocrisy, Mr Ex-Directory Number Ringer.
Calling people who are ex-directory at home and screaming at them of course isn't stalkerish or strange behaviour either.
If you look up Iain Dale and Guido on Wikipedia, the majority of the so-called 'criticisms' of them are actually taken from and linked back to Ireland's sorry excuse for a blog.
"No doubt this post will be seen as an attemtp to smear Tim Ireland's good name..."
Ha ha ha ha ha...oh.
You were serious..?
You can't lose what you never had.
Hmmmm hypocrisy, now, let's see. I ingore Tim for months, I don't write about him, I don't link to him, I blacklist all his mail so I don't have to read it, and then he comments on my blog and pisses me off on a day when I am displaying outward signs of extreme loonyness so I decide to call him and call him, if I recall correctly, a 'fucking twat'.
Tim on the other hand posts hundreds of posts about someone, set's up websites about them, manically edits wikipedia, bombards them with threatening emails on a hourly basis sometimes, is hostile towards 'civilians' in respect of family members who have no part to play, and then turns up at court? Hypocrisy my arse Justin, the two are not even remotely comparable and you're either a thick as pig shit fucking idiot or just in outright denial about reality.
As for your comment about 'ex-directory' and the other one. What does that have to do with anything? If you ring Tim you're ringing an ex-directory number too. Of course it would take a special kind of idiot to actually believe that an ex-directory number really is unobtainable. It would take an even bigger idiot to think that it means hacking a database to get it. Of course I didn't get it that way, Tim has given it out to enough people in a very small industry.
Now Justin, if you're going to continue complete bollocks, fuck off and do it on your own blog. Stop polluting mine with your crap argumentation. It just makes you look stupid when you get all morally righteous and put forward propositions based on flawed comparative premises. Did I mention that you should fuck off yet? Oh yes, I did. Fuck off.
I've never understood why tedious/stalky little inadequates like TI and his acolyte Justin aren't just ignored by those of you who actually have something interesting to say. Nobody else gives a toss about them after all. And dare I say that posting about them just encourages them?
And this so clearly proves Ireland's and McKeating's point that the targeting of Order Order, Dale's Diary etc etc was all about blogging standards and so forth and there was not a hint of personal malice being involved. Clearly.
Posted anonymously as I don't want these people going through my bins, frankly
"Actually, if things had worked out..."
Lots of things don't seem to be working out for self-obsessed, irrelevant leftwingers lately, do they?
Where's your evidence, Dizzy? And what are 'civilians'?
The evidence is well documented all over the Internet go and find it. As for civilians, that refers to people external of all this shit who have nothing to do with it being pulled into it.
Then coming up with a single link for each claim shouldn't be a problem for you.
www.bloggerheads.com
www.order-order.com
iaindale.blogspot.com (see comments over time)
I suppose the evidence of wikistalking is at www.wikipedia.org
Right on the front page, too. Idiot.
Moi an idiot? I'm not the one that thinks a "link" constitutes "evidence" or the one that thinks emails people have received are publicly available for people to link to. I shan't call you an idiot though, I'll just call you a retard instead. Now go bugger yourself with a pickling fork.
What a pity the conspiracy theory is backed by reality.
what bollocks
"Tim on the other hand posts hundreds of posts about someone, set's up websites about them, manically edits wikipedia,"
Manically edits wikipedia? I'd ask for your evidence on this, but undoubtedly you'll just come back with "I'm not your researcher", so I'll give you a start.
Iain Dale's wikipedia entry has had 52 edits, but we'll ignore anyone who has only made one or two edits (including Iain himself, although he admited to making a number of edits from a variety of anonymous IP addresses). By those criteria, the top editors of Iain's entry are:
MarkThomas 12 edits
Nssdfdsfds 9 edits
Pogsurf 5 edits
London1982 4 edits
SouthernNights 2 edits
Paul's entry has undoubtedly undergone more edits, 408 in total. Again ignoring those who've only made one or two edits (including Paul himself).
So we have the following:
Nssdfdsfds 74 edits
Alan Pascoe 56 edits
DWaterson 40 edits
62.136.238.65 26 edits
Pogsurf 9 edits
Skandha ji 9 edits
147.114.226.172 8 edits
Fys 7 edits
81.171.224.194 6 edits
217.35.112.97 5 edits
81.170.117.54 5 edits
91.104.27.46 5 edits
Hobson 5 edits
Valenciano 5 edits
80.177.97.178 3 edits
82.31.164.67 3 edits
91.104.24.22 3 edits
Nakedbatman 3 edits
Rwendland 3 edits
Soobrickay 3 edits
Now Tim Ireland isn't Nssdfdsfds, Alan Pascoe, DWaterson, MarkThomas, Pogsurf, London1982, SouthernNights, Skandha ji or Fys. He could be editing from a variety of IP addresses, but knowing his broadband provider, he can't be all of the anonymous IP editors. Furthermore, most of the anonymous IPs have been talk contributions.
So, Tim Ireland obviously doesn't "manically edit wikipedia" for two of the bloggers he has the biggest issues with.
But then, that's your typically geek-boy, pseudo-intellectual, vanity bollocks shining through again, isn't it? Never let facts get in the way of a good rant, eh.
Still, I don't visit your stench-ridden festering corner of the net that often, so couldn't really give a stuff whether you post this comment or not.
PS - I'm not Tim Ireland or Justin McKeating.
PPS - Decree Nisi through yet?
What is this bees and pens shite?
Staines problems were a direct result of his drinking.
His refusal to allow anyone to interfere with his drinking had a further impact on his problems come sentencing.
He has a drink problem.
And you appear to have an anger problem.
"Tim has given it out to enough people in a very small industry"
So you went around asking people for it? Creepy.
Did you tell them why you wanted it, or did you lie?
Unlike moi it seems my enemies can't even organise a piss-up...
Really do need a better class of enemy. "Make it up" Maguire, Suzanne Moore, Toynbee, Watson, Sir Michael and a bunch of internet obsessives hanging off your every word is not that flattering.
Though Tim's "Dr Evil" impersonations can sometimes be fun. You do have to give him credit, he does do a vendetta properly. Pointlessly, but definitely thoroughly. Always amazes me that he will write 1000 thousand words about 100 words I have written.
re: confused of S Yorks: Shouldn't that be "confused of China"?
re: anon: No, the 'small industry' comment means that people mention names you twat.
Dizzy Thinks
But only what Guido & Dale tell him to.
Twat
Yay, another anonymous conspiracy loon that makes statements seeking to claim in depth knowledge of my personal motivation. Moi a twat? No no no. The twat is the person making statements of certainty that bear no resemblance to reality.
Do I consider Guido and Iain friends? Undoubtedly. Do I think that Tim's post is littered with utterly pathetic and logically fallacious reasoning as well? Yes. It's not really that difficult a thing to grasp, unlike the "you're just typing what Guido told you too" line like a panty wetting school girl.
Do come back for more though..... 'Twat'
You seem a bit stalky yourself there, Phil, considering your past form with ex-directory numbers. As for Staines, the prick should have been sent down for at least a year. That kind of arrogant twat killed a cousin of mine, thinking he does'nt need to follow the basic laws. Absolute wanker.
Post a Comment