Now here's an interesting report in the U.S from Harvard that has looked at the cost benefit of computerisation in hospitals. They studied 4,000 hospitals in the U.S over a four-year period and found that the massive spending required to install and run an IT system in a hospital outweighed the supposed cost savings of doing it and didn't produce more efficient outcomes.
Of course this is the private sector who never spend money on things in health that have negative cost beneifts because they're only driven by their evil desire for profit. I'm sure the NHS could take some lessons from this report on how not to waste money on IT, but I doubt it will.
Via ComputerWorld
Tuesday, December 01, 2009
Computers do not save hospitals money?
Labels:
health,
technology
Computers do not save hospitals money?
2009-12-01T08:33:00Z
dizzy
health|technology|
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Dizzy reads
- Ben Brogan
- Big Brother Watch
- Boulton & Co
- Charlotte Gore
- Coffee House
- Conservative Home
- Croydonian
- Dan Hannan
- Danny Finkelstein
- Donal Blaney
- Douglas Carswell MP
- FT Westminster
- Guido Fawkes
- Hoby Cartoons
- Iain Dale
- Keep Thinking Butch
- Nadine Dorries
- Nothing British
- Old Holborn
- Paul Waugh
- Political Betting
- Politics Home
- Red Box
- Shane Greer
- Sky.com/News Blog
- Sunlight COPS
- Three Line Whip
- Tom Harris MP
- Tory Bear
- Tory Radio
- Trixy
Not Lefties
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(1050)
- December (60)
- November (60)
- October (65)
- September (78)
- August (85)
- July (85)
- June (96)
- May (119)
- April (104)
- March (115)
- February (86)
- January (97)
-
►
2008
(1024)
- December (71)
- November (106)
- October (72)
- September (110)
- August (68)
- July (76)
- June (51)
- May (102)
- April (83)
- March (87)
- February (101)
- January (97)


