tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22202011.post8457404547898402630..comments2008-09-26T07:22:42.776+01:00dizzynoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22202011.post-26889121158674578192008-09-25T19:05:00.000+01:002008-09-25T19:05:00.000+01:00Of course its party political.<BR/><BR/>This lot think there's no difference between the State and the Labour Party, which is as I remind you according to their 1997 Manifesto, "Nothing less than the political arm of the British people as a whole".GeoffHnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22202011.post-35950641730875631442008-09-25T16:48:00.000+01:002008-09-25T16:48:00.000+01:00Borderline I'd say. Factual, and by being so explicit about it's hard to claim that it's "party political" rather than mere reportage.The Head Hitterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12115218331365746411noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22202011.post-3723372588981032972008-09-25T15:19:00.000+01:002008-09-25T15:19:00.000+01:00You missed reference to Labour Party, and didn't Sarajh wear a skirt (rather tha dress) ?.<BR/><BR/>See http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7632966.stm for grey top, black skirt.<BR/><BR/>So, she lies concerning her first public appearance as a political prop!.<BR/><BR/>I'd pay more if I could get her damp knickers, as she seemed to enjoy herself immenselyWhifflernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22202011.post-79361317026456789232008-09-25T12:49:00.000+01:002008-09-25T12:49:00.000+01:00I am just surprised that anyone thinks an item of clothing is made more valuable, or even "famous", by having been worn at a party conference, let alone a Labour Party Conference, let alone by Mr or Mrs Brown at a Labour Party Conference.Alexhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13775753218753337766noreply@blogger.com